|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
St George’s
Day |
|
Every English person has heard of St George, or should
have! He is the patron Saint of our country and yet most Churches only pay scant
attention to him. The Roman Catholic Church, for instance, now honours him
only as a minor Saint, whilst some authorities claim he never existed at all.
The English have always been a bit ambivalent about celebrating St George’s
Day. Although it is gaining in popularity, it is still celebrated less in
England than St Patrick’s Day! This is maybe partly because George is not
seen as an indigenous Anglo Saxon hero – then again St Patrick was not Irish.
It may also be down to England’s Protestant culture which places less
emphasis on Saints, especially when they are steeped in myth and legend. |
||||||||||||
Part of the problem is that, whilst it is generally
accepted that George did exist, very little is known about him. Furthermore,
the story of him slaying a dragon is myth grafted on to the real person. Yet
in the middle ages, his feast day was celebrated with almost as much
enthusiasm as Christmas. He is still greatly honoured in the Orthodox Church,
where his feast day is November 23 rather than April 23 as in the western
Churches. One of the reasons that lead to confusion about St George
is that there are several stories attached to him. Perhaps the best known is
called the ‘Golden Legend’. In this, a dragon lived in a lake near Silena
in Libya. Whole armies had been destroyed trying to kill the monster. It ate
two sheep a day, but when these could not be provided, local maidens were
sacrificed instead. One day, so the story goes, the King’s daughter drew the
unlucky lot and was to be given to the dragon to devour. St George, who was
conveniently passing by, came to her rescue, killing the dragon with a single
blow from his lance. He then delivered a powerful sermon and converted the
locals to Christianity. He also distributed his reward money among the poor
and rode off into the sunset! However, this story is
clearly myth and allegorical in nature. It is also likely to be relatively
late in origin as the earliest accounts of him do not feature the dragon.
There are several of these early accounts. Eusebius of Caesarea, writing in
about 322, provides the earliest hint of an historical account, although he
does not mention George by name. He tells of a
soldier of noble birth who was put to death under the Roman Emperor
Diocletian at Nicomedia on 23 April, 303, but gives no further details.
Another important early text relating to the life of St
George is called the Vienna Palimpsest. A palimpsest is a manuscript that has
had its original text deleted and new material overwritten onto it. Also
written in Greek, this script dates from the fifth century. As with many
texts of this period, it includes material which is clearly of a mythical
rather than factual nature. Nevertheless, it is thought to have been very
influential in the development of the St George story. It claims to be based
on an earlier account written by a servant of George called Pasicrates. This is a common claim in the writings of
early Saints, intended to give weight to their authenticity or perhaps to
give them the illusion of authenticity. In this account, George is again of
Cappadocian origin, but this time living in Palestine. The story runs along
similar lines to the one described above. George visits the pagan ruler, Dadianos, seeking promotion within the Imperial army. Dadianos has banned Christianity and ordered his people
to sacrifice to the Roman Gods. George refuses to do this and gives away his
money and possessions to the poor.
The evil ruler Dadianos, has been described as a tyrant or dragon. This may be an
allegory that grew into the story of St George slaying a dragon. There is, in
fact, a tradition in Greek Orthodox icons to depict St George slaying a man
with sword and shield rather than a dragon. The increasingly unrealistic nature of the stories
associated with George, led in 494, to Pope Gelasius
to conclude the life of St George as being absurd. However, it was decided
that he should remain a Saint and he was grouped with others who are revered
by men, but ‘whose actions are known only to God’. In other words, the Church
accepted the authenticity of George as a genuine martyr, but was not
convinced of the legend attached to him. But the mythical stories attached to
George continued to grow and develop in ever more flamboyant ways,
culminating in the George and the dragon story we know today.
Another influence on the story is thought to be the Emperor
Constantine (272 – 337). Constantine
was the first Christian Emperor and his conversion did much to ensure the
supremacy of the Christian faith over others within the Empire. Constantine
built a Church in the City of Lydda in honour of St
George. Some authors have suggested that this Church included a statue of
Constantine standing on top of a dragon or serpent and holding the banner of
the cross in his right hand. It is suggested, therefore, that the early
followers of St George mixed these two images. The period of Constantine
may also provide a context for the development of the cult of St George.
Constantine, whilst being the first Christian Emperor, carried on practicing
his old pagan religion throughout his life and was not actually baptised until he lay on his death bed. He did, however, issue
the edict of Milan in 313 which granted religious freedom within the western
Empire over which he ruled. Licinius, the Emperor
of the eastern Empire continued to persecute Christians, though, and this led
to a civil war between east and west in 324. Constantine won this war,
marking the beginning of the Christian ascendancy in Europe. The Orthodox Church is clear that George was a real human
being. A typical story current in the Church is similar to that found in the
1964 manuscript, though with some differences. The Orthodox account has
George born into a noble Christian family in Cappadocia rather than Nubia.
Following the death of his father, he was brought up as a soldier and became
a great military leader. In his early life, Dadianos,
the King of Persia, decreed that anyone not worshipping his 'idols' would be
persecuted and tortured. When visiting the port city of Tyre (in modern
Lebanon), George saw the people bowing down to these idols. He reputably went
up to the King and boldly proclaimed the Christian faith. Apparently, this
didn't go down too well with the Persian king, who shoved him into prison and
tortured him mercilessly. In prison, the Lord came to George and told him he
was going to suffer the 'greatest' of martyr’s deaths - not once, not twice,
but three times! He would then be raised up in glory to heaven. During this period of torture and persecution, which lasted
seven years, many people reputably witnessed George's bravery and became
Christians themselves, including the King's wife. After seven years, King Dadianos decided to change strategy. He offered his
daughter to George in marriage if only he would worship his gods. George
pretended to accept this offer, but he called out to the Lord instead and the
idols were destroyed. For this, George was beheaded and declared a Christian
Saint. The Venerable Bede (673 – 735) records St George in his martyrology. He recounts that the Saint was martyred on
April 23 on the orders of Dacian who he describes as a ‘Persian King’. Bede
also recounts a story told to Abbot Adamnan of Iona
by Bishop Arculf who had visited Lydda and been to the shrine of St George there. Here, he
was told a story of how a man had promised to hand over his horse to George
in return for his protection. The man reneged on this promise and so the
Saint made the horse wild and unmanageable thus forcing the man to keep his
promise. Perhaps more importantly, Bishop Arculf
would have seen the statue of Constantine standing over the dragon.
During the middle ages, stories developed that St George
had travelled to Britain as a tribune of the Roman army on the orders of
Diocletian. For instance, he is said to have been a friend of Helena, the
Empress, and it is claimed that he found the ‘True Cross’ on which Christ was
crucified. It is also said that Helena dedicated a Church to George in
Jerusalem close to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Other traditions tell of
St George visiting the tomb of St Joseph of Arimathea, to whom he was
related, in Glastonbury. These, and other, stories reflect the development of
the cult of St George in England which culminated in his becoming our Patron
Saint. The Anglo-Saxon writer Aelfric wrote a commentary on St
George around the year 1000. He describes the Saint as being a ‘rich eoldorman, under the fierce Datianus,
in the shire of Cappadocia’. A monastery was dedicated to St George in
Thetford during the reign of King Canute (1017 – 1035). There was also a
Church of St George in Southwark during the Anglo-Saxon period and one
dedicated to him in Doncaster in 1061. The collegiate Church of St George in
Oxford was dedicated in 1074, just after the Norman invasion. He became the
Patron Saint of England by the end of the fourteenth century and in 1415, the
year of the battle of Agincourt, his feast day was declared to be a major
feast to be observed like Christmas. The cross of St George was incorporated into the uniform of
English soldiers, possibly during the reign of Richard I. When Richard II
invaded Scotland in 1385, every man was ordered to wear ‘the arms of St
George', both on their front and backs. Any enemy soldiers who also wore such
a cross were put to death. The supposed tomb of St George can still be seen at Lod, south-east of Tel-Aviv; and a convent in Cairo
preserves personal objects which are believed to have belonged to him. So how has this Middle Eastern character, who had probably never heard of England let alone been
here, become our patron saint? The answer seems to lie in the crusades and
the medieval taste for giving the Christian religion a Germanic ‘heroic’
gloss. The imagery of the dragon is not part of the original story and seems
to have been added later and Christianised to embellish the myth that had
already grown up around George in medieval times. The Orthodox explain this
imagery by saying that the dragon represents the devil and that by 'slaying'
him, George is overcoming evil and representing the victory of the Church. His name, George, could be derived from the words ‘geo’,
suggesting ‘earth’ and ‘orge’, suggesting to ‘till’. In other words, he who tills the earth. He is also known as ‘Green George and in
Islam is called ‘al Khidir’ – the green one. His
festival in the western world is on April 23 and so associated with the
coming of spring and new vegetation. He is killed several times (depending on
which legend you are reading) and rises back to life on all but the last
occasion. Whilst this may not be part of the original story, there does seem
to be a strong association with the dying vegetation God best known to the
English as Ingeld or Ing Freyr. His association with vegetation and name as the
‘Green One’ could also be the origin of the mediaeval custom of the ‘Green
Man’, brought to England from the middle east during the crusades. Heroic warriors fighting dragons is a deep and well
established part of Germanic mythology. The Icelandic epic Volsungasaga tells the story of Sigurd the dragon slayer. The old High German epic Nibelungenlied mirrors this tradition with
the story of Siegfried. For the English, the legend is best known through the
epic tale of Beowulf. Here, the hero defeats the monster Grendel, and his
mother, and wisely rules over his people for many years. In old age, he is
called on to defeat a dragon who has been disturbed
by someone trying to steal the treasure hoard he was guarding. Beowulf is the
only one brave enough to fight the dragon and a heroic battle takes place.
Although our hero defeats the dragon, he is himself mortally wounded and soon
after dies.
This treasure held great symbolic meaning to our ancestors.
The King was chosen as the link between the tribe and the gods. It was said
that he held the tribes' luck' or ‘Maegan’. This was represented by his
treasure, which he held in trust for the tribe as a whole. However, 'luck'
had a deeper meaning than it does now. It referred to the tribe's well-being,
the gods and with nature. It was linked to their collective Wyrd or fate. If
the King was in favour with the gods, all went well with the tribe. They
prospered, had good harvests, did well in battle and
so on. But if the King's luck' diminished, things would go wrong. Harvests
would fail, wars would be lost and the tribe would suffer starvation, disease
and defeat. So what is the significance of the dragon guarding the treasure
hoard and of the heroic fight against it? At the heart of the dragon stories lies our ancestors' understanding of the world, passed
down to us in myths and legends. These myths contain profound wisdom that we
are only just beginning to once again understand. For the dragon does not
simply represent evil, slain by the righteous hero. It represents something
far more profound. Firstly though, we need to understand what our ancestors
understood dragons to be. They are in fact a type of snake, the Old English word Wyrm being used for both. Snakes are seen in
northern mythology as a representation of the forces of chaos, negative
change and destruction. The Norse myth of the world serpent Jormungandr demonstrates this view well. At the
end of the current time cycle, or the Ragnarok, he
battles with the gods. He is defeated and slain by Thor, but Thor himself
dies of terrible wounds inflicted in the fight. Interestingly, this reflects
the Beowulf story. The Ragnarok is itself a
mythological representation of part of the time cycle when great changes come
about. The forces of chaos represented by the Giants, the Fenris
Wolf and the World Serpent represent negative change and destruction of the
established order. It is interesting that the early legends of St George
refer to the people that he battles against as ‘Paynims’,
a term that came to be seen in the middle ages as synonymous with Giants.
This does seem to be another indication of how a Middle Eastern legend was
absorbed and adapted into earlier folk lore which must have lain in the
collective memories of the people rather than having died out as is so often
assumed. The concept of a cosmic battle between good and evil, light
and darkness lies at the heart of Indo Euroean
religion and is central to religions such as Zoroastrianism. In this fight
and the myth of St George, then, we have a window into a particular Indo
European and Germanic theology which is an important element of restoring
Germanic or Saxon Christianity.
So the cult of St George is many things. There is a real
man behind the stories and whilst he never set foot in England he has come to
embody English chivalry. Unlike rivals such as St Cuthbert and St Edmund (to
whom we give great honour), George has come to represent the whole of England
and is not a ‘regional’ saint. In many ways his only rival as Patron of
England is King Alfred the Great who we also greatly honour. But George has
something else and this is the mythology that surrounds him and which has
made Church bodies down the ages suspicious of him. This myth,
is something that goes deep into our Anglo Saxon identity and has much to
teach us about the world view of our ancestors. Fighting the dragon above all
else embodies the Indo European idea of good fighting evil to overcome the
forces of chaos and maintain order. As such, St George really is an English
icon; an embodiment of Saxon Christianity we seek to restore. But there is another aspect to George’s slaying of the
dragon which speaks volumes to us in our modern world. In this we see the dragon
representing the greed, degeneracy and anti-English prejudice that has
gripped our nation’s ruling class. The dragon can be seen as a symbol of
multi-culturalism and cultural Marxism which is slowly strangling a once
proud and productive people. St George is the embodiment of our fight back
against all of this and the final victory that we know will be ours. To this end, we pray to George for the preservation and
protection of England. |